After the referendum — a brief explainer of Brexit so far….

Prime Ministers, prerogatives and proroguing Parliament

Image for post
Image for post

A new leader

When David Cameron resigned then, it fell to his party — the Conservatives — to find a new leader who would step into the role of PM. The leadership election process varies between parties but generally consists of an initial vote by the parties’ Members of Parliament (MP) until two candidates remain. The final vote is then put to the members of that party across the country. So, if you are a member of a political party, and that party is electing a leader, you will have a vote. The leadership contest of 2016 was a little unusual, as all but one of the candidates withdrew before the final round of voting. Theresa May, as the last woman standing, became the leader of the Conservative Party and Prime Minister. She signalled her intention to deliver Brexit and notify the EU of the UK’s intention to leave by triggering Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union which facilitates leaving the EU. Once Article 50 is triggered a two-year countdown begins at the end of which the member state in question ceases to be a part of the EU. Extensions to the two year period can be granted with the consent of all member states. A legal challenge was immediately launched against the triggering of Article 50.

Not your prerogative

Entering and exiting international treaties fall within the prerogative powers, exercised by the Prime Minister and their ministers in the name of the monarch. Theresa May’s stance was that as the EU Treaties are international treaties she was within her remit to take the UK out of those treaties. A legal challenge argued that, due to the constitutional importance of the Treaties, this could not be done without the involvement of Parliament. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom agreed, noting that Parliament could not be circumvented when constitutional changes were afoot. As mentioned in my previous explained, the EU Treaties are unique in that they create a direct source of law for member states. Unlike most international treaties, which are essentially little more than agreements between governments, the EU Treaties directly create rights for citizens of member states. This elevates the EU Treaties to constitutional status and Parliament must be consulted when changes to the constitution are afoot.

Theresa out, Boris in

Following the procedure explained above, Boris Johnson won the leadership contest and was duly appointed Prime Minister with a pledge of leaving the EU on 31st October, deal or no deal. This has whipped Parliament into a frenzy with a no-deal exit being touted as an economic Armageddon from which the UK would take years, if not decades, to emerge. Johnson’s supposed preference is to strike a deal with the EU but to leave without one if a deal cannot be agreed before the deadline. This sounds simple enough so it may be worth taking a quick inventory of the forces which are currently in play:

Proroguing Parliament

Proroguing parliament is a common occurrence and is usually an uncontroversial event. Prorogation ends the current parliamentary session and puts a halt to any parliamentary business which is still ongoing. The various committees which sit are disbanded. Any legislation which is making its way through parliament is effectively killed off. Parliament is put on hiatus for a set period. The power to prorogue is a prerogative power which is exercised by the monarch on the advice of the Prime Minister. Note that prorogation differs from the dissolution of parliament which is the process by which all MPs lose their seats in preparation for a general election. Prorogation is commonly used when a new Prime Minister or government takes power as it allows for the current session to make way for a new session for which the PM will set out their agenda. While a standard procedure, the prorogation of Parliament by Boris Johnson has provoked an outcry.

A constitutional outrage?

The outcry surrounding Boris Johnson’s move has centred around the fact that the prorogation of Parliament at this time will not allow time for adequate discussion and debate of the options to leave the EU with a deal. If no deal or action is taken before 31st October the UK will automatically leave the EU. Against this backdrop suspending Parliament does appear to be a cynical move. Claims of a coup d’état by an unelected Prime Minister have prompted discussions of the nature and suitability of the UK constitution. The monarch, who is traditionally apolitical, has been dragged into the debate with commentators claiming that she should not have consented to suspend Parliament at this critical time. Arguments against the suspension are understandable. From a constitutional standpoint, however, everything is above board. Johnson is indeed an unelected PM, but as has been discussed, the UK does not elect PMs, it elects representatives with party affiliations with the PM being the leader of the party with the largest representation. As was noted in a previous story, the exercise of prerogative powers rests with the Prime Minister of the day, not the personal whim of the monarch.

Which way now?

As things stand Parliament will return to work today, 3rd September 2019, before being prorogued in the week of the 9th September, returning on 24th October. That gives Parliament a week to find a way through the stalemate and achieve its desire to enforce an extension to the 31st October deadline. It will also have a week when Parliament resumes in October. So what will happen next? In short, nobody knows and watch this space. Parliament may choose to subject Johnson to a vote of no confidence which would indicate that he no longer commands the confidence of the House of Commons. This would almost certainly lead to a general election however the date for that election would be set by the Prime Minister. Johnson could simply set an election date for after 31st October thereby ensuring the UK’s exit. This would surely add to the outrage which is already being vented. This will be an interesting week in UK politics in which the Speaker of the House and the Clerks of the Commons will play a pivotal role. The Speaker and the Clerks are experts in parliamentary procedure and it will be interesting to see what mechanisms they may uncover. Suffice to say, it is not over yet.

Copywriter, photographer, husband, father, soon to be dog owner.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store